Clearly Stewert Robson is a know nothing ex footballer with a usless opinion who clearly likes being controversial because hes a lonely old git!!!! No ones cares for your opinion Robson as its shite!!!

I think you should just keep your stupid comments to yourself Stewart. Obviously your getting on abit now and don't know what you're talking about.

Maybe you should go and support France and do us all a favour.

The reason you've been reading Jagielka is a good player, is because he is a good player, as is Michael Dawson. The only thing Terry has on either of them is experience, he is severely lacking in pace and technically no better than either of the pairing used against Bulgaria. Terry has been overrated for years as has Rio! I definitely believe that Jagielka and Daws can forge an effective partnership, and also believe that Cahill and Shawcross can be decent understudies.

No doubt if Jags signed for Arsenal he would change his mind. I watch him every week and he is class, he has marked Torres out of the game on more than one occasion. He is faster than Terry and is a better passer of the ball.

I wonder how many times Robson has seen Jagielka play? He must be the world's best scout if he can come to such a considered opinion after 1 game!

Another example of a London based so called "expert" not knowing what they are talking about, Muppet.

Who would he suggest plays instead of Jagielka then?? He's early into his international career, hasn't really put a foot wrong when he's played and he's being slated, ok he lost David Villa against Spain in the friendly that we played last year but i'm sure he's not the only defender that Villa has made to look slightly foolish!!

The decision to take Carragher and King ahead of Jagielka to the World Cup was absolutely staggering, Phil Jagielka is more than capable at playing at international level for many years to come.